Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Rhosemc
Subscriptions
Total
109 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-1635 | 2 Netapp, Redhat | 26 Active Iq Unified Manager, Oncommand Workflow Automation, Amq Streams and 23 more | 2025-10-24 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability was found in Undertow. This vulnerability impacts a server that supports the wildfly-http-client protocol. Whenever a malicious user opens and closes a connection with the HTTP port of the server and then closes the connection immediately, the server will end with both memory and open file limits exhausted at some point, depending on the amount of memory available. At HTTP upgrade to remoting, the WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit leaks connections if RemotingConnection is closed by Remoting ServerConnectionOpenListener. Because the remoting connection originates in Undertow as part of the HTTP upgrade, there is an external layer to the remoting connection. This connection is unaware of the outermost layer when closing the connection during the connection opening procedure. Hence, the Undertow WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit is not notified of the closed connection in this scenario. Because WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit creates a timeout task, the whole dependency tree leaks via that task, which is added to XNIO WorkerThread. So, the workerThread points to the Undertow conduit, which contains the connections and causes the leak. | ||||
| CVE-2023-46604 | 4 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 1 more | 10 Activemq, Activemq Legacy Openwire Module, Debian Linux and 7 more | 2025-10-23 | 10 Critical |
| The Java OpenWire protocol marshaller is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution. This vulnerability may allow a remote attacker with network access to either a Java-based OpenWire broker or client to run arbitrary shell commands by manipulating serialized class types in the OpenWire protocol to cause either the client or the broker (respectively) to instantiate any class on the classpath. Users are recommended to upgrade both brokers and clients to version 5.15.16, 5.16.7, 5.17.6, or 5.18.3 which fixes this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58712 | 1 Redhat | 2 Amq Broker, Rhosemc | 2025-10-22 | 5.2 Medium |
| A container privilege escalation flaw was found in certain AMQ Broker images. This issue stems from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during build time. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44487 | 32 Akka, Amazon, Apache and 29 more | 367 Http Server, Opensearch Data Prepper, Apisix and 364 more | 2025-10-21 | 7.5 High |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6020 | 1 Redhat | 12 Cert Manager, Confidential Compute Attestation, Discovery and 9 more | 2025-10-21 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in linux-pam. The module pam_namespace may use access user-controlled paths without proper protection, allowing local users to elevate their privileges to root via multiple symlink attacks and race conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4066 | 1 Redhat | 6 Amq Broker, Enterprise Linux, Jboss A-mq and 3 more | 2025-10-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat's AMQ Broker, which stores certain passwords in a secret security-properties-prop-module, defined in ActivemqArtemisSecurity CR; however, they are shown in plaintext in the StatefulSet details yaml of AMQ Broker. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4065 | 1 Redhat | 6 Amq Broker, Enterprise Linux, Jboss A-mq and 3 more | 2025-10-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat AMQ Broker Operator, where it displayed a password defined in ActiveMQArtemisAddress CR, shown in plain text in the Operator Log. This flaw allows an authenticated local attacker to access information outside of their permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6927 | 1 Redhat | 5 Build Keycloak, Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On and 2 more | 2025-10-09 | 4.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. This issue may allow an attacker to steal authorization codes or tokens from clients using a wildcard in the JARM response mode "form_post.jwt" which could be used to bypass the security patch implemented to address CVE-2023-6134. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6134 | 1 Redhat | 9 Build Keycloak, Enterprise Linux, Keycloak and 6 more | 2025-10-09 | 4.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak that prevents certain schemes in redirects, but permits them if a wildcard is appended to the token. This issue could allow an attacker to submit a specially crafted request leading to cross-site scripting (XSS) or further attacks. This flaw is the result of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-10748. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6563 | 1 Redhat | 9 Build Keycloak, Enterprise Linux, Keycloak and 6 more | 2025-10-09 | 7.7 High |
| An unconstrained memory consumption vulnerability was discovered in Keycloak. It can be triggered in environments which have millions of offline tokens (> 500,000 users with each having at least 2 saved sessions). If an attacker creates two or more user sessions and then open the "consents" tab of the admin User Interface, the UI attempts to load a huge number of offline client sessions leading to excessive memory and CPU consumption which could potentially crash the entire system. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6291 | 1 Redhat | 18 Build Keycloak, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Data Grid and 15 more | 2025-10-09 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in the redirect_uri validation logic in Keycloak. This issue may allow a bypass of otherwise explicitly allowed hosts. A successful attack may lead to an access token being stolen, making it possible for the attacker to impersonate other users. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4853 | 2 Quarkus, Redhat | 21 Quarkus, Build Of Optaplanner, Build Of Quarkus and 18 more | 2025-10-09 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Quarkus where HTTP security policies are not sanitizing certain character permutations correctly when accepting requests, resulting in incorrect evaluation of permissions. This issue could allow an attacker to bypass the security policy altogether, resulting in unauthorized endpoint access and possibly a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10234 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid and 5 more | 2025-09-25 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Wildfly, where a user may perform Cross-site scripting in the Wildfly deployment system. This flaw allows an attacker or insider to execute a deployment with a malicious payload, which could trigger undesired behavior against the server. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7341 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2025-09-23 | 7.1 High |
| A session fixation issue was discovered in the SAML adapters provided by Keycloak. The session ID and JSESSIONID cookie are not changed at login time, even when the turnOffChangeSessionIdOnLogin option is configured. This flaw allows an attacker who hijacks the current session before authentication to trigger session fixation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4629 | 1 Redhat | 12 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Enterprise Linux and 9 more | 2025-09-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. This flaw allows attackers to bypass brute force protection by exploiting the timing of login attempts. By initiating multiple login requests simultaneously, attackers can exceed the configured limits for failed attempts before the system locks them out. This timing loophole enables attackers to make more guesses at passwords than intended, potentially compromising account security on affected systems. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4540 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2025-09-12 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak in OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests (PAR). Client-provided parameters were found to be included in plain text in the KC_RESTART cookie returned by the authorization server's HTTP response to a `request_uri` authorization request, possibly leading to an information disclosure vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5967 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2025-09-12 | 2.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. The LDAP testing endpoint allows changing the Connection URL independently without re-entering the currently configured LDAP bind credentials. This flaw allows an attacker with admin access (permission manage-realm) to change the LDAP host URL ("Connection URL") to a machine they control. The Keycloak server will connect to the attacker's host and try to authenticate with the configured credentials, thus leaking them to the attacker. As a consequence, an attacker who has compromised the admin console or compromised a user with sufficient privileges can leak domain credentials and attack the domain. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6484 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2025-09-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| A log injection flaw was found in Keycloak. A text string may be injected through the authentication form when using the WebAuthn authentication mode. This issue may have a minor impact to the logs integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8883 | 1 Redhat | 10 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 7 more | 2025-09-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| A misconfiguration flaw was found in Keycloak. This issue can allow an attacker to redirect users to an arbitrary URL if a 'Valid Redirect URI' is set to http://localhost or http://127.0.0.1, enabling sensitive information such as authorization codes to be exposed to the attacker, potentially leading to session hijacking. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8698 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more | 2025-09-12 | 7.7 High |
| A flaw exists in the SAML signature validation method within the Keycloak XMLSignatureUtil class. The method incorrectly determines whether a SAML signature is for the full document or only for specific assertions based on the position of the signature in the XML document, rather than the Reference element used to specify the signed element. This flaw allows attackers to create crafted responses that can bypass the validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation or impersonation attacks. | ||||