Filtered by vendor Microsoft
Subscriptions
Total
23148 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-25238 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 3 Windows, Officescan, Worry-free Business Security | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An improper access control information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro OfficeScan XG SP1 and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain information about an agent's managing port. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25237 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Apex One | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One (on-prem) could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain information about the managing port used by agents. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25236 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 3 Windows, Officescan, Worry-free Business Security | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) information disclosure vulnerability in Trend Micro OfficeScan XG SP1 and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to locate online agents via a specific sweep. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25235 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 3 Windows, Apex One, Officescan | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One (on-prem and SaaS) and OfficeScan XG SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain information about a content inspection configuration file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25234 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 4 Windows, Apex One, Officescan and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One (on-prem and SaaS), OfficeScan XG SP1, and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain information about a specific notification configuration file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25233 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 4 Windows, Apex One, Officescan and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One (on-prem and SaaS), OfficeScan XG SP1, and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain information about a specific configuration download file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25232 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 3 Windows, Apex One, Officescan | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One (on-prem and SaaS) and OfficeScan XG SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain information about the SQL database. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25231 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 4 Windows, Apex One, Officescan and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One (on-prem and SaaS), OfficeScan XG SP1, and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain information about a specific hotfix history file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25230 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 3 Windows, Apex One, Officescan | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One (on-prem and SaaS) and OfficeScan XG SP1 could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain information about the contents of a scan connection exception file. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25195 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Windows PKU2U Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24114 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Teams | 2024-11-21 | 5.7 Medium |
| Microsoft Teams iOS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24113 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24112 | 1 Microsoft | 4 .net, .net Core, Mono and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| .NET Core Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24111 | 1 Microsoft | 10 .net, .net Framework, Windows 10 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| .NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24110 | 1 Microsoft | 1 High Efficiency Video Coding | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24109 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Kubernetes Service | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
| Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24108 | 1 Microsoft | 3 365 Apps, Excel, Office | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24107 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Windows Event Tracing Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24106 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10, Windows 10 1803, Windows 10 1809 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Windows DirectX Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-24105 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Package Manager Configurations | 2024-11-21 | 8.4 High |
| <p>Depending on configuration of various package managers it is possible for an attacker to insert a malicious package into a package manager's repository which can be retrieved and used during development, build, and release processes. This insertion could lead to remote code execution. We believe this vulnerability affects multiple package managers across multiple languages, including but not limited to: Python/pip, .NET/NuGet, Java/Maven, JavaScript/npm.</p> <p><strong>Attack scenarios</strong></p> <p>An attacker could take advantage of this ecosystem-wide issue to cause harm in a variety of ways. The original attack scenarios were discovered by Alex Birsan and are detailed in their whitepaper, <a href="https://medium.com/@alex.birsan/dependency-confusion-4a5d60fec610">Dependency Confusion: How I Hacked Into Apple, Microsoft and Dozens of Other Companies</a>.</p> <ul> <li><p>With basic knowledge of the target ecosystems, an attacker could create an empty shell for a package and insert malicious code in the install scripts, give it a high version, and publish it to the public repository. Vulnerable victim machines will download the higher version of the package between the public and private repositories and attempt to install it. Due to code incompatibility it will probably error out upon import or upon compilation, making it easier to detect; however the attacker would have gained code execution by that point.</p> </li> <li><p>An advanced attacker with some inside knowledge of the target could take a copy of a working package, insert the malicious code (in the package itself or in the install), and then publish it to a public repository. The package will likely install and import correctly, granting the attacker an initial foothold and persistence.</p> </li> </ul> <p>These two methods could affect target organizations at any of these various levels:</p> <ul> <li>Developer machines</li> <li>An entire team if the configuration to import the malicious package is uploaded to a code repository</li> <li>Continuous integration pipelines if they pull the malicious packages during the build, test, and/or deploy stages</li> <li>Customers, download servers, production services if the malicious code has not been detected</li> </ul> <p>This remote code execution vulnerability can only be addressed by reconfiguring installation tools and workflows, and not by correcting anything in the package repositories themselves. See the <strong>FAQ</strong> section of this CVE for configuration guidance.</p> | ||||