Total
13155 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23123 | 1 Autodesk | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 9 more | 2025-09-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed in CC5Dll.dll and ASMBASE228A.dll through Autodesk AutoCAD, may force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23122 | 1 Autodesk | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 9 more | 2025-09-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted 3DM file, when parsed in opennurbs.dll through Autodesk AutoCAD, may force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23121 | 1 Autodesk | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 9 more | 2025-09-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed in libodxdll.dll through Autodesk AutoCAD, may force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23120 | 1 Autodesk | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 9 more | 2025-09-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted STP and STEP file, when parsed in ASMIMPORT228A.dll and ASMIMPORT229A.dll through Autodesk AutoCAD, may force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-46729 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-09-26 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix incorrect size calculation for loop [WHY] fe_clk_en has size of 5 but sizeof(fe_clk_en) has byte size 20 which is lager than the array size. [HOW] Divide byte size 20 by its element size. This fixes 2 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0446 | 1 Autodesk | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 9 more | 2025-09-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted STP, CATPART or MODEL file, when parsed in ASMKERN228A.dll and ASMdatax229A.dll through Autodesk AutoCAD, may force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8901 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-09-26 | 8.8 High |
| Out of bounds write in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior to 139.0.7258.127 allowed a remote attacker to perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2024-7254 | 3 Google, Netapp, Redhat | 15 Google-protobuf, Protobuf, Protobuf-java and 12 more | 2025-09-26 | 7.5 High |
| Any project that parses untrusted Protocol Buffers data containing an arbitrary number of nested groups / series of SGROUP tags can corrupted by exceeding the stack limit i.e. StackOverflow. Parsing nested groups as unknown fields with DiscardUnknownFieldsParser or Java Protobuf Lite parser, or against Protobuf map fields, creates unbounded recursions that can be abused by an attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52868 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-09-26 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: thermal: core: prevent potential string overflow The dev->id value comes from ida_alloc() so it's a number between zero and INT_MAX. If it's too high then these sprintf()s will overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48014 | 1 Dell | 1 Bsafe Micro-edition-suite | 2025-09-26 | 7.5 High |
| Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions prior to 5.0.2.3 contain an Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55611 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 3 Dir-619l B1, Dir-619l, Dir-619l Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| D-Link DIR-619L 2.06B01 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formLanguageChange function via the nextPage parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55602 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 3 Dir-619l, Dir-619l, Dir-619l Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| D-Link DIR-619L 2.06B01 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formSysCmd function via the submit-url parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55599 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 3 Dir-619l, Dir-619l, Dir-619l Firmware | 2025-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| D-Link DIR-619L 2.06B01 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formWlanSetup function via the parameter f_wds_wepKey. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23328 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Nvidia | 4 Linux, Linux Kernel, Windows and 1 more | 2025-09-25 | 7.5 High |
| NVIDIA Triton Inference Server for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause an out-of-bounds write through a specially crafted input. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23329 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Nvidia | 4 Linux, Linux Kernel, Windows and 1 more | 2025-09-25 | 7.5 High |
| NVIDIA Triton Inference Server for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause memory corruption by identifying and accessing the shared memory region used by the Python backend. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41042 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 3 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2025-09-25 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: prefer nft_chain_validate nft_chain_validate already performs loop detection because a cycle will result in a call stack overflow (ctx->level >= NFT_JUMP_STACK_SIZE). It also follows maps via ->validate callback in nft_lookup, so there appears no reason to iterate the maps again. nf_tables_check_loops() and all its helper functions can be removed. This improves ruleset load time significantly, from 23s down to 12s. This also fixes a crash bug. Old loop detection code can result in unbounded recursion: BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at .... Oops: stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 4 PID: 1539 Comm: nft Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5+ #1 [..] with a suitable ruleset during validation of register stores. I can't see any actual reason to attempt to check for this from nft_validate_register_store(), at this point the transaction is still in progress, so we don't have a full picture of the rule graph. For nf-next it might make sense to either remove it or make this depend on table->validate_state in case we could catch an error earlier (for improved error reporting to userspace). | ||||
| CVE-2025-10779 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 3 Dcs-935l, Dcs-935l, Dcs-935l Firmware | 2025-09-25 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability was found in D-Link DCS-935L up to 1.13.01. The impacted element is the function sub_402280 of the file /HNAP1/. The manipulation of the argument HNAP_AUTH/SOAPAction results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41003 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-09-25 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix reg_set_min_max corruption of fake_reg Juan reported that after doing some changes to buzzer [0] and implementing a new fuzzing strategy guided by coverage, they noticed the following in one of the probes: [...] 13: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) ; R0=map_value(ks=4,vs=8) R6_w=scalar() 14: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0 15: (b4) w0 = -1 ; R0_w=0xffffffff 16: (74) w0 >>= 1 ; R0_w=0x7fffffff 17: (5c) w6 &= w0 ; R0_w=0x7fffffff R6_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=umax32=0x7fffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff)) 18: (44) w6 |= 2 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=umax32=0x7fffffff,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) 19: (56) if w6 != 0x7ffffffd goto pc+1 REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (true_reg2): range bounds violation u64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] u32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (false_reg1): range bounds violation u64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] u32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (false_reg2): const tnum out of sync with range bounds u64=[0x0, 0xffffffffffffffff] s64=[0x8000000000000000, 0x7fffffffffffffff] u32=[0x0, 0xffffffff] s32=[0x80000000, 0x7fffffff] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) 19: R6_w=0x7fffffff 20: (95) exit from 19 to 21: R0=0x7fffffff R6=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=0x7ffffffe,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 21: R0=0x7fffffff R6=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=0x7ffffffe,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 21: (14) w6 -= 2147483632 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=umin32=2,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=0x80000012,smax32=14,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffd)) 22: (76) if w6 s>= 0xe goto pc+1 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=umin32=2,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=0x80000012,smax32=13,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffd)) 23: (95) exit from 22 to 24: R0=0x7fffffff R6_w=14 R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 24: R0=0x7fffffff R6_w=14 R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 24: (14) w6 -= 14 ; R6_w=0 [...] What can be seen here is a register invariant violation on line 19. After the binary-or in line 18, the verifier knows that bit 2 is set but knows nothing about the rest of the content which was loaded from a map value, meaning, range is [2,0x7fffffff] with var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd). When in line 19 the verifier analyzes the branch, it splits the register states in reg_set_min_max() into the registers of the true branch (true_reg1, true_reg2) and the registers of the false branch (false_reg1, false_reg2). Since the test is w6 != 0x7ffffffd, the src_reg is a known constant. Internally, the verifier creates a "fake" register initialized as scalar to the value of 0x7ffffffd, and then passes it onto reg_set_min_max(). Now, for line 19, it is mathematically impossible to take the false branch of this program, yet the verifier analyzes it. It is impossible because the second bit of r6 will be set due to the prior or operation and the constant in the condition has that bit unset (hex(fd) == binary(1111 1101). When the verifier first analyzes the false / fall-through branch, it will compute an intersection between the var_off of r6 and of the constant. This is because the verifier creates a "fake" register initialized to the value of the constant. The intersection result later refines both registers in regs_refine_cond_op(): [...] t = tnum_intersect(tnum_subreg(reg1->var_off), tnum_subreg(reg2->var_off)); reg1->var_o ---truncated--- | ||||
| CVE-2025-1277 | 1 Autodesk | 11 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 8 more | 2025-09-25 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk applications, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1656 | 1 Autodesk | 11 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 8 more | 2025-09-25 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PDF file, when linked or imported into Autodesk applications, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||