Filtered by vendor Apache
Subscriptions
Total
2662 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-7676 | 1 Apache | 1 Ranger | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Policy resource matcher in Apache Ranger before 0.7.1 ignores characters after '*' wildcard character - like my*test, test*.txt. This can result in unintended behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9787 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When using a Spring AOP functionality to secure Struts actions it is possible to perform a DoS attack. Solution is to upgrade to Apache Struts version 2.5.12 or 2.3.33. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7673 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 uses not very strong cryptographic storage, captcha is not used in registration and forget password dialogs and auth forms missing brute force protection. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5018 | 6 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 3 more | 16 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 13 more | 2025-04-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 a malicious web application was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via a Tomcat utility method that was accessible to web applications. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7669 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Hadoop 2.8.0, 3.0.0-alpha1, and 3.0.0-alpha2, the LinuxContainerExecutor runs docker commands as root with insufficient input validation. When the docker feature is enabled, authenticated users can run commands as root. | ||||
| CVE-2014-7808 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| Apache Wicket before 1.5.13, 6.x before 6.19.0, and 7.x before 7.0.0-M5 make it easier for attackers to defeat a cryptographic protection mechanism and predict encrypted URLs by leveraging use of CryptoMapper as the default encryption provider. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7672 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| If an application allows enter an URL in a form field and built-in URLValidator is used, it is possible to prepare a special URL which will be used to overload server process when performing validation of the URL. Solution is to upgrade to Apache Struts version 2.5.12. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6815 | 1 Apache | 1 Ranger | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Ranger before 0.6.2, users with "keyadmin" role should not be allowed to change password for users with "admin" role. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12618 | 1 Apache | 1 Portable Runtime Utility | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Portable Runtime Utility (APR-util) 1.6.0 and prior fail to validate the integrity of SDBM database files used by apr_sdbm*() functions, resulting in a possible out of bound read access. A local user with write access to the database can make a program or process using these functions crash, and cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6809 | 1 Apache | 2 Nutch, Tika | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Apache Tika before 1.14 allows Java code execution for serialized objects embedded in MATLAB files. The issue exists because Tika invokes JMatIO to do native deserialization. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7683 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 displays Tomcat version and detailed error stack trace, which is not secure. | ||||
| CVE-2009-1198 | 1 Apache | 1 Juddi | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache jUDDI before 2.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the dsname parameter to happyjuddi.jsp. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5663 | 1 Apache | 1 Fineract | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Fineract 0.4.0-incubating, 0.5.0-incubating, and 0.6.0-incubating, an authenticated user with client/loan/center/staff/group read permissions is able to inject malicious SQL into SELECT queries. The 'sqlSearch' parameter on a number of endpoints is not sanitized and appended directly to the query. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5657 | 1 Apache | 1 Archiva | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Several REST service endpoints of Apache Archiva are not protected against Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. A malicious site opened in the same browser as the archiva site, may send an HTML response that performs arbitrary actions on archiva services, with the same rights as the active archiva session (e.g. administrator rights). | ||||
| CVE-2017-5655 | 1 Apache | 1 Ambari | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Ambari 2.2.2 through 2.4.2 and Ambari 2.5.0, sensitive data may be stored on disk in temporary files on the Ambari Server host. The temporary files are readable by any user authenticated on the host. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5654 | 1 Apache | 1 Ambari | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Ambari 2.4.x (before 2.4.3) and Ambari 2.5.0, an authorized user of the Ambari Hive View may be able to gain unauthorized read access to files on the host where the Ambari server executes. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0226 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 7 Wss4j, Jboss Amq, Jboss Data Grid and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.0.x before 2.0.2 improperly leaks information about decryption failures when decrypting an encrypted key or message data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover the plaintext form of a symmetric key via a series of crafted messages. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-2487. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6807 | 1 Apache | 1 Ambari | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Custom commands may be executed on Ambari Agent (2.4.x, before 2.4.2) hosts without authorization, leading to unauthorized access to operations that may affect the underlying system. Such operations are invoked by the Ambari Agent process on Ambari Agent hosts, as the user executing the Ambari Agent process. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5653 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5650 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, the handling of an HTTP/2 GOAWAY frame for a connection did not close streams associated with that connection that were currently waiting for a WINDOW_UPDATE before allowing the application to write more data. These waiting streams each consumed a thread. A malicious client could therefore construct a series of HTTP/2 requests that would consume all available processing threads. | ||||