Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Satellite
Subscriptions
Total
550 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-35195 | 2 Redhat, Request Project | 10 Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2025-07-31 | 5.6 Medium |
| Requests is a HTTP library. Prior to 2.32.0, when making requests through a Requests `Session`, if the first request is made with `verify=False` to disable cert verification, all subsequent requests to the same host will continue to ignore cert verification regardless of changes to the value of `verify`. This behavior will continue for the lifecycle of the connection in the connection pool. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.32.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11407 | 2 Grpc, Redhat | 4 Grpc, Ansible Automation Platform, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-07-23 | 7.5 High |
| There exists a denial of service through Data corruption in gRPC-C++ - gRPC-C++ servers with transmit zero copy enabled through the channel arg GRPC_ARG_TCP_TX_ZEROCOPY_ENABLED can experience data corruption issues. The data sent by the application may be corrupted before transmission over the network thus leading the receiver to receive an incorrect set of bytes causing RPC requests to fail. We recommend upgrading past commit e9046b2bbebc0cb7f5dc42008f807f6c7e98e791 | ||||
| CVE-2024-7246 | 2 Grpc, Redhat | 5 Grpc, Ansible Automation Platform, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-07-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| It's possible for a gRPC client communicating with a HTTP/2 proxy to poison the HPACK table between the proxy and the backend such that other clients see failed requests. It's also possible to use this vulnerability to leak other clients HTTP header keys, but not values. This occurs because the error status for a misencoded header is not cleared between header reads, resulting in subsequent (incrementally indexed) added headers in the first request being poisoned until cleared from the HPACK table. Please update to a fixed version of gRPC as soon as possible. This bug has been fixed in 1.58.3, 1.59.5, 1.60.2, 1.61.3, 1.62.3, 1.63.2, 1.64.3, 1.65.4. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50471 | 2 Davegamble, Redhat | 3 Cjson, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-07-22 | 7.5 High |
| cJSON v1.7.16 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the function cJSON_InsertItemInArray at cJSON.c. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50472 | 2 Davegamble, Redhat | 3 Cjson, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-07-22 | 7.5 High |
| cJSON v1.7.16 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the function cJSON_SetValuestring at cJSON.c. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10219 | 3 Netapp, Oracle, Redhat | 199 Active Iq Unified Manager, Element, Management Services For Element Software And Netapp Hci and 196 more | 2025-07-07 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31755 | 2 Cjson Project, Redhat | 3 Cjson, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-06-30 | 7.6 High |
| cJSON v1.7.17 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation, which can trigger through the second parameter of function cJSON_SetValuestring at cJSON.c. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28366 | 2 Eclipse, Redhat | 3 Mosquitto, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-06-26 | 7.5 High |
| The broker in Eclipse Mosquitto 1.3.2 through 2.x before 2.0.16 has a memory leak that can be abused remotely when a client sends many QoS 2 messages with duplicate message IDs, and fails to respond to PUBREC commands. This occurs because of mishandling of EAGAIN from the libc send function. | ||||
| CVE-2023-1932 | 2 Hibernate, Redhat | 24 Hibernate-validator, A Mq Clients, Amq Broker and 21 more | 2025-06-24 | 6.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in hibernate-validator's 'isValid' method in the org.hibernate.validator.internal.constraintvalidators.hv.SafeHtmlValidator class, which can be bypassed by omitting the tag ending in a less-than character. Browsers may render an invalid html, allowing HTML injection or Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36479 | 3 Debian, Eclipse, Redhat | 7 Debian Linux, Jetty, Jboss Fuse and 4 more | 2025-06-18 | 3.5 Low |
| Eclipse Jetty Canonical Repository is the canonical repository for the Jetty project. Users of the CgiServlet with a very specific command structure may have the wrong command executed. If a user sends a request to a org.eclipse.jetty.servlets.CGI Servlet for a binary with a space in its name, the servlet will escape the command by wrapping it in quotation marks. This wrapped command, plus an optional command prefix, will then be executed through a call to Runtime.exec. If the original binary name provided by the user contains a quotation mark followed by a space, the resulting command line will contain multiple tokens instead of one. This issue was patched in version 9.4.52, 10.0.16, 11.0.16 and 12.0.0-beta2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1471 | 2 Redhat, Snakeyaml Project | 14 Amq Clients, Amq Streams, Enterprise Linux and 11 more | 2025-06-18 | 8.3 High |
| SnakeYaml's Constructor() class does not restrict types which can be instantiated during deserialization. Deserializing yaml content provided by an attacker can lead to remote code execution. We recommend using SnakeYaml's SafeConsturctor when parsing untrusted content to restrict deserialization. We recommend upgrading to version 2.0 and beyond. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22195 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 9 Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage and 6 more | 2025-06-17 | 5.4 Medium |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46727 | 2 Rack, Redhat | 7 Rack, Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s and 4 more | 2025-06-17 | 7.5 High |
| Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to versions 2.2.14, 3.0.16, and 3.1.14, `Rack::QueryParser` parses query strings and `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` bodies into Ruby data structures without imposing any limit on the number of parameters, allowing attackers to send requests with extremely large numbers of parameters. The vulnerability arises because `Rack::QueryParser` iterates over each `&`-separated key-value pair and adds it to a Hash without enforcing an upper bound on the total number of parameters. This allows an attacker to send a single request containing hundreds of thousands (or more) of parameters, which consumes excessive memory and CPU during parsing. An attacker can trigger denial of service by sending specifically crafted HTTP requests, which can cause memory exhaustion or pin CPU resources, stalling or crashing the Rack server. This results in full service disruption until the affected worker is restarted. Versions 2.2.14, 3.0.16, and 3.1.14 fix the issue. Some other mitigations are available. One may use middleware to enforce a maximum query string size or parameter count, or employ a reverse proxy (such as Nginx) to limit request sizes and reject oversized query strings or bodies. Limiting request body sizes and query string lengths at the web server or CDN level is an effective mitigation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38875 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-06-16 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.14 and 5.0 before 5.0.7. urlize and urlizetrunc were subject to a potential denial of service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of brackets. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39329 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-06-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. The django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method allows remote attackers to enumerate users via a timing attack involving login requests for users with an unusable password. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39330 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-06-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class, when they override generate_filename() without replicating the file-path validations from the parent class, potentially allow directory traversal via certain inputs during a save() call. (Built-in Storage sub-classes are unaffected.) | ||||
| CVE-2024-39614 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 3 more | 2025-06-16 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. get_supported_language_variant() was subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52323 | 2 Pycryptodome, Redhat | 7 Pycryptodome, Pycryptodomex, Ansible Automation Platform and 4 more | 2025-06-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| PyCryptodome and pycryptodomex before 3.19.1 allow side-channel leakage for OAEP decryption, exploitable for a Manger attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22047 | 2 Collectiveidea, Redhat | 2 Audited, Satellite | 2025-06-03 | 3.1 Low |
| A race condition exists in Audited 4.0.0 to 5.3.3 that can result in an authenticated user to cause audit log entries to be attributed to another user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21647 | 2 Puma, Redhat | 2 Puma, Satellite | 2025-06-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| Puma is a web server for Ruby/Rack applications built for parallelism. Prior to version 6.4.2, puma exhibited incorrect behavior when parsing chunked transfer encoding bodies in a way that allowed HTTP request smuggling. Fixed versions limits the size of chunk extensions. Without this limit, an attacker could cause unbounded resource (CPU, network bandwidth) consumption. This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 6.4.2 and 5.6.8. | ||||