Total
302 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-52301 | 2 Debian, Laravel | 2 Debian Linux, Framework | 2025-08-26 | 7.5 High |
| Laravel is a web application framework. When the register_argc_argv php directive is set to on , and users call any URL with a special crafted query string, they are able to change the environment used by the framework when handling the request. The vulnerability fixed in 6.20.45, 7.30.7, 8.83.28, 9.52.17, 10.48.23, and 11.31.0. The framework now ignores argv values for environment detection on non-cli SAPIs. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1712 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2025-08-22 | 8.8 High |
| Argument injection in special agent configuration in Checkmk <2.4.0p1, <2.3.0p32, <2.2.0p42 and 2.1.0 allows authenticated attackers to write arbitrary files | ||||
| CVE-2024-32462 | 3 Fedoraproject, Flatpak, Redhat | 7 Fedora, Flatpak, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2025-08-21 | 8.4 High |
| Flatpak is a system for building, distributing, and running sandboxed desktop applications on Linux. in versions before 1.10.9, 1.12.9, 1.14.6, and 1.15.8, a malicious or compromised Flatpak app could execute arbitrary code outside its sandbox. Normally, the `--command` argument of `flatpak run` expects to be given a command to run in the specified Flatpak app, optionally along with some arguments. However it is possible to instead pass `bwrap` arguments to `--command=`, such as `--bind`. It's possible to pass an arbitrary `commandline` to the portal interface `org.freedesktop.portal.Background.RequestBackground` from within a Flatpak app. When this is converted into a `--command` and arguments, it achieves the same effect of passing arguments directly to `bwrap`, and thus can be used for a sandbox escape. The solution is to pass the `--` argument to `bwrap`, which makes it stop processing options. This has been supported since bubblewrap 0.3.0. All supported versions of Flatpak require at least that version of bubblewrap. xdg-desktop-portal version 1.18.4 will mitigate this vulnerability by only allowing Flatpak apps to create .desktop files for commands that do not start with --. The vulnerability is patched in 1.15.8, 1.10.9, 1.12.9, and 1.14.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29768 | 2 Netapp, Vim | 3 Bootstrap Os, Hci Compute Node, Vim | 2025-08-18 | 4.4 Medium |
| Vim, a text editor, is vulnerable to potential data loss with zip.vim and special crafted zip files in versions prior to 9.1.1198. The impact is medium because a user must be made to view such an archive with Vim and then press 'x' on such a strange filename. The issue has been fixed as of Vim patch v9.1.1198. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44452 | 1 Linuxmint | 1 Xreader | 2025-08-14 | 7.8 High |
| Linux Mint Xreader CBT File Parsing Argument Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Linux Mint Xreader. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of CBT files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-22132. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47516 | 1 Redhat | 1 Pagure | 2025-08-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability was found in Pagure. An argument injection in Git during retrieval of the repository history leads to remote code execution on the Pagure instance. | ||||
| CVE-2021-1484 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager | 2025-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco SD-WAN vManage Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary commands on an affected system and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation of user-supplied input to the device template configuration. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted input to the device template configuration. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition on the affected system.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53509 | 1 Advantech | 1 Iview | 2025-08-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability exists in Advantech iView that allows for argument injection in the NetworkServlet.restoreDatabase(). This issue requires an authenticated attacker with at least user-level privileges. An input parameter can be used directly in a command without proper sanitization, allowing arbitrary arguments to be injected. This can result in information disclosure, including sensitive database credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6232 | 1 Lenovo | 2 Commercial Vantage, Vantage | 2025-07-22 | 7.8 High |
| An improper validation vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Vantage that under certain conditions could allow a local attacker to execute code with elevated permissions by modifying specific registry locations. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6231 | 1 Lenovo | 2 Commercial Vantage, Vantage | 2025-07-22 | 7.8 High |
| An improper validation vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Vantage that under certain conditions could allow a local attacker to execute code with elevated permissions by modifying an application configuration file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46835 | 2025-07-15 | 8.5 High | ||
| Git GUI allows you to use the Git source control management tools via a GUI. When a user clones an untrusted repository and is tricked into editing a file located in a maliciously named directory in the repository, then Git GUI can create and overwrite files for which the user has write permission. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.43.7, 2.44.4, 2.45.4, 2.46.4, 2.47.3, 2.48.2, 2.49.1, and 2.50.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52459 | 1 Advantech | 1 Iview | 2025-07-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability exists in Advantech iView that allows for argument injection in NetworkServlet.backupDatabase(). This issue requires an authenticated attacker with at least user-level privileges. Certain parameters can be used directly in a command without proper sanitization, allowing arbitrary arguments to be injected. This can result in information disclosure, including sensitive database credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53542 | 2025-07-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Headlamp is an extensible Kubernetes web UI. A command injection vulnerability was discovered in the codeSign.js script used in the macOS packaging workflow of the Kubernetes Headlamp project. This issue arises due to the improper use of Node.js's execSync() function with unsanitized input derived from environment variables, which can be influenced by an attacker. The variables ${teamID}, ${entitlementsPath}, and ${config.app} are dynamically derived from the environment or application config and passed directly to the shell command without proper escaping or argument separation. This exposes the system to command injection if any of the values contain malicious input. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.31.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48385 | 1 Git | 1 Git | 2025-07-13 | 8.3 High |
| Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals. When cloning a repository Git knows to optionally fetch a bundle advertised by the remote server, which allows the server-side to offload parts of the clone to a CDN. The Git client does not perform sufficient validation of the advertised bundles, which allows the remote side to perform protocol injection. This protocol injection can cause the client to write the fetched bundle to a location controlled by the adversary. The fetched content is fully controlled by the server, which can in the worst case lead to arbitrary code execution. The use of bundle URIs is not enabled by default and can be controlled by the bundle.heuristic config option. Some cases of the vulnerability require that the adversary is in control of where a repository will be cloned to. This either requires social engineering or a recursive clone with submodules. These cases can thus be avoided by disabling recursive clones. This vulnerability is fixed in v2.43.7, v2.44.4, v2.45.4, v2.46.4, v2.47.3, v2.48.2, v2.49.1, and v2.50.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3817 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Go-getter | 2025-07-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| HashiCorp’s go-getter library is vulnerable to argument injection when executing Git to discover remote branches. This vulnerability does not affect the go-getter/v2 branch and package. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39710 | 1 Ivanti | 2 Connect Secure, Policy Secure | 2025-07-11 | N/A |
| Argument injection in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.1 and 9.1R18.7 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.1 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39711 | 1 Ivanti | 2 Connect Secure, Policy Secure | 2025-07-11 | N/A |
| Argument injection in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.1 and 9.1R18.7 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.1 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39712 | 1 Ivanti | 2 Connect Secure, Policy Secure | 2025-07-11 | N/A |
| Argument injection in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.1 and 9.1R18.7 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.1 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38655 | 1 Ivanti | 2 Connect Secure, Policy Secure | 2025-06-27 | 7.2 High |
| Argument injection in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.1 and 9.1R18.9 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.1 and 9.1R18.9 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38656 | 1 Ivanti | 3 Automation, Connect Secure, Policy Secure | 2025-06-27 | 9.1 Critical |
| Argument injection in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.2 and 9.1R18.9 and Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to achieve remote code execution. | ||||